Eltiam

Eltiam

The Role and Comparison of Imaging Modalities (Ultrasonography, Radiography, and Infrared Thermography) in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Lameness in Dairy Cows

Document Type : Review article

Authors
Rasoul Rahimzadeh 1
Erfan Eftekhar 2
Erfan Mehmandoost 3
Kimia Azimi 3
1 Department of Clinical Sciences, Sa.C., lslamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
2 DVM Student, Sa.C., lslamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran
3 DVM Student, Sa.C., lslamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
10.61882/eltiamj.12.2.4
Abstract
Background and Study Type: Lameness is one of the most important health and economic problems in dairy cows, associated with reduced animal welfare, decreased milk production, and increased culling rates. This Review Study was conducted with the aim of investigating the role of imaging modalities in the differential diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and prevention of lameness.
Objective: The main objective was to analyze the capabilities and limitations of various imaging modalities, including Radiography (X-ray), Ultrasonography (USG), Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and Infrared Thermography (IRT), in identifying bone and soft tissue lesions associated with lameness.
Methods: This article systematically reviewed scientific literature published between 1980 and 2025, collecting and analyzing key findings on the application of imaging in veterinary medicine. The focus was on studies that evaluated diagnostic accuracy, suitability for treatment monitoring, and feasibility for use in farm settings.
Results: Ultrasonography was identified as the most practical and efficient method (Cost–Effectiveness Ratio: 0.85) due to its field-use capability and soft tissue assessment. It demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.97 in diagnosing septic arthritis. Radiography maintained its primary role in diagnosing phalangeal fractures and chronic bone lesions. Infrared Thermography (IRT), as a non-invasive and rapid screening tool, was able to detect inflammation (hoof surface temperature increase up to approximately $34.5^\circ\text{C}$) with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 92.4%. Advanced methods like CT and MRI offered the highest accuracy (95% to 98%) in structural detail of bone and soft tissue but their widespread use is limited to complex and research cases. Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between reduced digital cushion thickness in USG and MRI with a low BCS, and increased bone lesions in radiography with a high Lameness Score (LS).
Conclusion: Integrating multiple imaging modalities can significantly enhance the diagnostic accuracy and prognosis of lameness. The use of novel technologies such as Artificial Intelligence in image analysis promises a bright future for automated and preventive monitoring of dairy cow health.
Keywords
Ultrasonography
Lameness
Radiography
Infrared Thermography
Dairy Cow
Subjects
1.      Bicalho RC, Oikonomou G. Control and prevention of lameness associated with claw lesions in dairy cows. Livest Sci. 2013;156(1-3):96-105. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2013.06.007
2.      Shearer JK, Van Amstel SR, Brodersen BW. Clinical diagnosis of foot and leg lameness in cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2012;28(3):535-56. doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.07.003
3.      Kofler J. Ultrasonography as a diagnostic aid in bovine musculoskeletal disorders. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2009;25(3):687-731. doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2009.07.011
4.      Kofler J, Geissbühler U, Steiner A. Diagnostic imaging in bovine orthopedics. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2014;30(1):11-53. doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2013.11.003
5.      Nigam JM, Singh AP. Radiography of bovine foot disorders. Mod Vet Pract. 1980;61(7):621-4. PMID: 7432345.
6.      Anees R, Dinesh PT, Nithin CJ, Sooryadas S, Chandy G, David PV. Radiographic Changes in Hoof Affections of Dairy Cattle. J Vet Anim Sci (Kerala). 2022;53(2):158-62. doi:10.51966/jvas.2022.53.2.158-162
7.      Rodrigues da Silva WP, Queiroz PJB, da Cunha PHJ, Noronha Filho ADF, Arnhold E, de Resende Fernandes JJ, et al. Radiographic Analysis of the Beef Cattle Digits Slaughtered after 114 Days of Confinement. Vet Med Int. 2024;2024:5512555. doi:10.1155/2024/5512555
8.      Heppelmann M, Rehage J, Kofler J, Starke A. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of septic arthritis of the distal interphalangeal joint in cattle. Vet J. 2009;179(3):407-16. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.10.017
9.      Laschinger C, Rieger A, Auer U, Lischer C. Diagnostic imaging of the bovine digit: a retrospective analysis of 300 cases. Vet Rec. 2021;189(6):e248. doi:10.1002/vetr.248
10.  Hagag U, Brehm W, Gerlach K, Tawfiek MG. Computed Tomography of the Normal Bovine Tarsus. Anat Histol Embryol. 2016;45(6):469-78. doi:10.1111/ahe.12233
11.  Arican M, Hatiploglu F, Erol H, Kanat O, Yavuz O, Parlak K, et al. Comparison of Thermographic Imaging and Other Diagnostic Techniques in Diagnosis of Cattle with Laminitis. Acta Sci Vet. 2018;46:1575. doi:10.22456/1679-9216.87224
12.  Nazhvani SD, Abbasi S, Tadjalli M. Arteriographic evaluation of the normal distal limb of the goat. Iran J Vet Surg. 2007;3(1):35-40.
13.  Tryon KA, Clark CR. Ultrasonographic examination of the distal limb of cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1999;15(2):275-300. doi:10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30183-3
14.  Kofler J. Arthrosonography--the use of diagnostic ultrasound in septic and traumatic arthritis in cattle--a retrospective study of 25 patients. Br Vet J. 1996;152(6):683-98. doi:10.1016/s0007-1935(96)80122-9
15.  Hagag U, Tawfiek MG. Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the bovine metacarpo/metatarsophalangeal joint. Vet J. 2018;233:66-75. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.01.001
16.  Bobić T, Raguž N, Oroz M, Gregić M, Mijić P, Kranjac D, et al. Application of Infrared Thermography in the Detection of Hoof Disease and Lameness in Cattle. Animals (Basel). 2025;15(8):1086. 10.3390/ani15081086
17.  Siachos N, Griffiths BE, Wilson JP, Bedford C, Anagnostopoulos A, Neary JM, et al. Evaluation of a fully automated 2-dimensional imaging system for real-time cattle lameness detection using machine learning. J Dairy Sci. 2025;108(4):4206-24. doi:10.3168/jds.2024-25940
18.  FAVE. Clinical and radiological evaluation of bovine hoofs: A postmortem study. FAVE Cienc Vet. 2025;24(1):e0043. doi:10.14409/favecv.2025.1.e0043
19.  Ooshita K, Tsuka T, Itou Y. Ultrasonographic changes associated with the healing process in a fracture of the distal phalanx in a cow. J Vet Med Sci. 2020;82(9):1295-8. doi:10.1292/jvms.20-0113
20.  Fabbri G, Gianesella M, Morgante M, Armato L, Bonato O, Fiore E. Ultrasonographic alterations of bovine claws sole soft tissues associated with claw horn disruption lesions, body condition score and locomotion score in Holstein dairy cows. Res Vet Sci. 2020;131:146-52. doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.04.016
21.  Werema CW, Laven L, Mueller K, Laven R. Evaluating Alternatives to Locomotion Scoring for Lameness Detection in Pasture-Based Dairy Cows in New Zealand: Infra-Red Thermography. Animals (Basel). 2021;11(12):3473. doi:10.3390/ani11123473
22.  Werema CW, Laven LJ, Mueller KR, Laven RA. Evaluating the Effect of Preventative Trimming on Distance from the Sole Surface to the Distal Phalanx Using Ultrasonography for Lameness Prevention in Pasture-Based Dairy Cows. Vet Sci. 2023;10(2):77. doi:10.3390/vetsci10020077
23.  Siachos N, Griffiths BE, Wilson JP, Bedford C, Anagnostopoulos A, Neary JM, et al. Evaluation of a fully automated 2-dimensional imaging system for real-time cattle lameness detection using machine learning. J Dairy Sci. 2025;108(4):4206-24. doi:10.3168/jds.2024-25940
24.  Dutton-Regester KJ, Barnes TS, Wright JD, Alawneh JI, Rabiee AR. A systematic review of tests for the detection and diagnosis of foot lesions causing lameness in dairy cows. Prev Vet Med. 2018;149:53-66. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.11.003
25. Van Nuffel A, Zwertvaegher I, Pluym L, Van Weyenberg S, Thorup VM, Pastell M, et al. Lameness Detection in Dairy Cows: Part 1. How to Distinguish between Non-Lame and Lame Cows Based on Differences in Locomotion or Behavior. Animals (Basel). 2015;5(3):838-60. doi:10.3390/ani5030387

  • Receive Date 18 November 2025
  • Accept Date 31 January 2026
  • Publish Date 21 January 2026