Background: Spinal injuries in small animals, particularly dogs, are among the most frequent and complex challenges in veterinary specialty practice. These traumas—often resulting from car accidents, falls, or bite wounds—are commonly associated with high mechanical instability and neurological damage. Given the anatomical complexity and critical structures involved, accurate surgical planning and stabilization are essential. Objective: This article aims to describe and compare various surgical methods for spinal fixation in the cervical, thoracolumbar, and lumbosacral regions, providing practical clinical guidance for selecting the most appropriate technique based on anatomical location and injury characteristics. Methods: This narrative review compiles data from authoritative sources and clinical experience. It discusses injury classification using the three-compartment model, preoperative planning with advanced imaging (CT and MRI), reduction strategies, and surgical stabilization techniques. Methods covered include pin/monocortical screws with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), locking plate systems such as the String of Pearls (SOP) and Locking Compression Plate (LCP), and transarticular screws, as well as other techniques. Anatomical considerations, implant selection, and intraoperative access are also addressed. Results: The findings suggest that careful technique selection based on the anatomical region, neurological status, patient size, and equipment availability plays a critical role in minimizing complications and optimizing outcomes. Monocortical screws combined with PMMA and locking plates offer improved biomechanical stability and safety compared to older methods. Postoperative care, including pain control and monitoring for implant integrity, is essential for successful recovery. Conclusion: Effective management of spinal injuries in small animals requires a systematic approach including accurate diagnosis, advanced imaging, tailored surgical planning, and postoperative care. This article provides a comprehensive reference for veterinary surgeons in the selection and application of appropriate spinal stabilization strategies.
1.Shores A, Brisson BA. Current Techniques in Canine and Feline Neurosurgery: Wiley; 2017. 296 p.DOI:10.1002/9781118711545
2.Shores A, Brisson BA. Advanced techniques in canine and feline neurosurgery: John Wiley & Sons; 2023. DOI:10.1002/9781119790457
3.Watine S, Cabassu J, Catheland S, Brochier L, Ivanoff S. Computed tomography study of implantation corridors in canine vertebrae. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 2006;47(11):651-7.DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2006.00070.x
4.Shores A. Spinal trauma: pathophysiology and management of traumatic spinal injuries. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 1992;22(4):859-88. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-5616(92)50080-8
5.Corlazzoli D. Bicortical implant insertion in caudal cervical spondylomyelopathy: a computed tomography simulation in affected Doberman Pinschers. Veterinary Surgery. 2008;37(2):178-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00356.x
6.Hicks DG, Pitts MJ, Bagley RS, Vasavada A, Chen AV, Wininger FA, et al. In vitro biomechanical evaluations of screw-bar–polymethylmethacrylate and pin-polymethylmethacrylate internal fixation implants used to stabilize the vertebral motion unit of the fourth and fifth cervical vertebrae in vertebral column specimens from dogs. American journal of veterinary research. 2009;70(6):719-26 DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.70.6.719.
7.Hettlich BF, Allen MJ, Pascetta D, Fosgate GT, Litsky AS. Biomechanical comparison between bicortical pin and monocortical screw/polymethylmethacrylate constructs in the cadaveric canine cervical vertebral column. Veterinary Surgery. 2013;42(6):693-700. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12040.x
8.Hettlich BF, Fosgate GT, Litsky AS. Biomechanical comparison of 2 veterinary locking plates to monocortical screw/polymethylmethacrylate fixation in canine cadaveric cervical vertebral column. Veterinary Surgery. 2017;46(1):95-102. DOI: 10.1111/vsu.12581
9.Agnello KA, Kapatkin AS, Garcia TC, Hayashi K, Welihozkiy AT, Stover SM. Intervertebral biomechanics of locking compression plate monocortical fixation of the canine cervical spine. Veterinary Surgery. 2010;39(8):991-1000. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00755.x
10.Shamir MH, Chai O, Loeb E. A method for intervertebral space distraction before stabilization combined with complete ventral slot for treatment of disc‐associated wobbler syndrome in dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 2008;37(2):186-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00360.x
11.Steffen F, Voss K, Morgan JP. Distraction–fusion for caudal cervical spondylomyelopathy using an intervertebral cage and locking plates in 14 dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 2011;40(6):743-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00850.x
12.Trotter EJ. Cervical spine locking plate fixation for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in large breed dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 2009;38(6):705-18 DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2009.00541.x.
13.Bergman RL, Levine JM, Coates JR, Bahr A, Hettlich BF, Kerwin SC. Cervical spinal locking plate in combination with cortical ring allograft for a one level fusion in dogs with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Veterinary Surgery. 2008;37(6):530-6 DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00400.x.
14.Jones BG, Fosgate GT, Green EM, Habing AM, Hettlich BF. Magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts in the cervical vertebrae and spinal cord related to monocortical screw–polymethylmethacrylate implants in canine cadavers. American journal of veterinary research. 2017;78(4):458-64 DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.78.4.458.
15.Mateo I. Median manubriotomy for ventral access to the caudal cervical and cranial thoracic spine. Veterinary Surgery. 2020;49(5):923-9. DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13412
16.Voss K, Steffen F, Montavon P. Use of the compact unilock system for ventral stabilization procedures of the cervical spine. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 2006;19(01):21-8 PMID: 16594540.
17.Elford JH, Oxley B, Behr S. Accuracy of placement of pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine of dogs with spinal deformities with three‐dimensionally printed patient‐specific drill guides. Veterinary Surgery. 2020;49(2):347-53 DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13333 .
18.Fujioka T, Nakata K, Nakano Y, Nozue Y, Sugawara T, Konno N, et al. Accuracy and efficacy of a patient-specific drill guide template system for lumbosacral junction fixation in medium and small dogs: cadaveric study and clinical cases. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2020;6:494DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00494 .
19.Walker TM, Pierce WA, Welch RD. External fixation of the lumbar spine in a canine model. Veterinary Surgery. 2002;31(2):181-8. DOI: 10.1053/jvet.2002.31045
20.Voss K, Montavon PM. Tension band stabilization of fractures and luxations of the thoracolumbar vertebrae in dogs and cats: 38 cases (1993–2002). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2004;225(1):78-83. DOI: 10.2460/javma.2004.225.78