Eltiam

Eltiam

Three-dimensional triad of Heat stress, Comfort, and Lameness (HCL) in dairy cows: Breaking the lameness cycle through integrated management of comfort and heat stress using the "HCL Triad" model

Document Type : Review article

Authors
1 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
Backgroun: Comfort of dairy cows has a decisive effect on their health, production, and productive lifespan. Despite significant advances in understanding pathogenic mechanisms, lameness remains one of the major challenges of the global dairy industry, affecting on average about Twenty-two percent (22%) of dairy cows. Since welfare and environmental factors play a key role in the occurrence of non-infectious claw horn lesions (CHL) in dairy cows, these factors have been examined in this review study.
Objective: To introduce the "HCL triad" (Heat Stress, Comfort, Lameness) and investigate the complex and bidirectional relationship between these three factors.
Material and Methods: A review study was conducted using published sources in the field of comfort, heat stress, and lameness in dairy cows from reputable national and international journals and conferences.
Results: Comfort and heat stress affect the pathophysiology of lameness not only through cow behavior (pressure theory) but also through physiological and genomic pathways. Lameness, by altering animal behavior, exacerbating heat stress, and reducing comfort, creates a vicious cycle. Since each of these three events affects the others, the starting point for breaking the cycles varies depending on the herd and geography, requiring a study of the management and environmental processes of that region.
Final Conclusion: Since lameness or heat stress ultimately leads to a reduction or loss of dairy cow comfort, providing a comprehensive framework to understand the relationships between these three events and emphasizing management strategies based on animal comfort will lead to the successful control of claw horn lesions in dairy cows.
Keywords
Subjects

1.    Cook NB, Jelinski M, Erickson SE. Implications for Lameness Control in Cattle. Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice. 2025;41(3):395-406.. doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2025.06.005.
2.    Rahaman I, Samanta R, Ghosh C, Datta S. Dairy cattle welfare assessment-importance and significance: A review. J Pharm Innov. 2021;10:226-31.
3.    Nocek JE. Bovine acidosis: implications on laminitis. Journal of dairy science. 1997;80(5):1005-28.. doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(97)76026-0 .
4.    Knott L, Tarlton J, Craft H, Webster A. Effects of housing, parturition and diet change on the biochemistry and biomechanics of the support structures of the hoof of dairy heifers. The Veterinary Journal. 2007;174(2):277-87.. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.09.007 .
5.    Lim P, Huxley J, Willshire J, Green M, Othman A, Kaler J. Unravelling the temporal association between lameness and body condition score in dairy cattle using a multistate modelling approach. Preventive veterinary medicine. 2015;118(4):370-7. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.12.015.
6.    Bicalho RC, Machado V, Caixeta L. Lameness in dairy cattle: A debilitating disease or a disease of debilitated cattle? A cross-sectional study of lameness prevalence and thickness of the digital cushion. Journal of dairy science. 2009;92(7):3175-84.. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1827.
7.    Newsome R, Green MJ, Bell N, Chagunda M, Mason C, Rutland CS, et al. Linking bone development on the caudal aspect of the distal phalanx with lameness during life. Journal of Dairy Science. 2016;99(6):4512-25.. doi:10.3168/jds.2015-10202.
8.    Mirhaj M, Sadeghi MA. Applied Anatomy and Histology of the bovine hooves and limbs. Eltiam. 2022;15(2):14.. dor:20.1001.1.24235695.1400.8.2.7.3.
9.    Council FAW. Five Freedoms, Press statement. Farm Animal Welfare Council, London, UK. 1979.
10.  Fraser D, Weary DM, Pajor EA, Milligan BN. A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal welfare. 1997;6(3):187-205.. doi:10.1017/S0962728600019795
11.  Fraser D. Understanding animal welfare. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 2008;50(Suppl 1):S1.
12.  Wagner K, Brinkmann J, Bergschmidt A, Renziehausen C, March S. The effects of farming systems (organic vs. conventional) on dairy cow welfare, based on the Welfare Quality® protocol. Animal. 2021;15(8):100301.. doi:10.1016/j.animal.2021.100301
13.  Ventura G, Lorenzi V, Mazza F, Clemente GA, Iacomino C, Bertocchi L, et al. Best farming practices for the welfare of dairy cows, heifers and calves. Animals. 2021;11(9):2645.. doi:10.3390/ani11092645
14.  Lawrence AB, Vigors B, Sandøe P. What is so positive about positive animal welfare?—a critical review of the literature. Animals. 2019;9(10):783.. doi:10.3390/ani9100783
15.  Sangtarash R. Cow comfort, a basis for lameness control. Eltiam. 2019;11(2):78.. dor: 20.1001.1.24235695.1398.6.2.5.7
16.  Ahmadreza Mohamadnia RS. Control of Lameness in Cows Through Heat Stress Management and Welfare Improvement. proceedings of the symposium on Dairy Herd Helth and Production,31 December-2 January, Mashhad,Iran. 2026:15.
17.  Broom DM. Attempts to cope with the environment. Acta Agric Scand Sec A Anim Sci Suppl. 1996;27:22-8.
18.  Sundrum A, Rubelowski I. The meaningfulness of design criteria in relation to the mortality of fattening bulls. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A-Animal Science. 2001;51(S30):48-52.. doi:10.1080/090647001316923054.
19.  Oliveira CP, Sousa FCd, Silva ALd, Schultz ÉB, Valderrama Londoño RI, Souza PARd. Heat stress in dairy cows: impacts, identification, and mitigation strategies—a review. Animals. 2025;15(2):249.. doi:10.3390/ani15020249
20.  Dash S, Chakravarty A, Singh A, Upadhyay A, Singh M, Yousuf S. Effect of heat stress on reproductive performances of dairy cattle and buffaloes: A review. Veterinary world. 2016;9(3):235. doi:10.14202/vetworld.2016.235-244
21.  Herbut P, Hoffmann G, Angrecka S, GodyƄ D, Vieira FMC, Adamczyk K, et al. The effects of heat stress on the behaviour of dairy cows–a review. Annals of Animal Science. 2021;21(2):385-402.. doi: 10.2478/aoas-2020-0116.
22.  Scerri TM, Lomax S, Clark CEF. Bovine heat stress management: current amelioration approaches and the case for a novel mitogenomic strategy. Frontiers in Animal Science. 2023;4:1169743.. doi:10.3389/fanim.2023.1169743
23.  Becker C, Collier R, Stone A. Invited review: Physiological and behavioral effects of heat stress in dairy cows. Journal of dairy science. 2020;103(8):6751-70.. doi:10.3168/jds.2019-17929
24.  Kim W-S, Ghassemi Nejad J, Roh S-G, Lee H-G. Heat-shock proteins gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells as an indicator of heat stress in beef calves. Animals. 2020;10(5):895.. doi:10.3390/ani10050895
25.  Belhadj Slimen I, Najar T, Ghram A, Abdrrabba M. Heat stress effects on livestock: molecular, cellular and metabolic aspects, a review. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition. 2016;100(3):401-12.. doi:10.1111/jpn.12379.
26.  McPherson S, Vasseur E. The effects of bedding, stall length, and manger wall height on common outcome measures of dairy cow welfare in stall-based housing systems. 2020.
27.  Dippel S, Dolezal M, Brenninkmeyer C, Brinkmann J, March S, Knierim U, et al. Risk factors for lameness in freestall-housed dairy cows across two breeds, farming systems, and countries. Journal of dairy science. 2009;92(11):5476-86.. doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2288
28.  Griffiths BE, Grove White D, Oikonomou G. A cross-sectional study into the prevalence of dairy cattle lameness and associated herd-level risk factors in England and Wales. Frontiers in veterinary science. 2018;5:65.. doi:10.3389/fvets.2018.00065
29.  Pongsanun K, Apirak T, Aekaluck L, Sanphet C, Chaidate I. Classification of individual dairy cow behaviors using accelerometer, gyroscope, and integrated sensor models. BMC Veterinary Research. 2025;21(1):677.. doi:10.1186/s12917-025-05092-1
30.  Lavrova AI, Choucair A, Palmini A, Stock KF, Kammer M, Querengässer F, et al. Leveraging accelerometer data for lameness detection in dairy cows: a longitudinal study of six farms in Germany. Animals. 2023;13(23):3681.. doi:10.3390/ani13233681
31.  Lemmens L, Schodl K, Fuerst-Waltl B, Schwarzenbacher H, Egger-Danner C, Linke K, et al. The combined use of automated milking system and sensor data to improve detection of mild lameness in dairy cattle. Animals. 2023;13(7):1180.. doi:10.3390/ani13071180
32.  Osorio J, Batistel F, Garrett E, Elhanafy M, Tariq M, Socha M, et al. Corium molecular biomarkers reveal a beneficial effect on hoof transcriptomics in peripartal dairy cows supplemented with zinc, manganese, and copper from amino acid complexes and cobalt from cobalt glucoheptonate. Journal of dairy science. 2016;99(12):9974-82.. doi:10.3168/jds.2015-10698
33.  Blowey R, Chesterton N. Effect of footbath width on faecal contamination by cattle. The Veterinary Record. 2012;170(24):628.. doi: 10.1136/vr.e4100
34.  Singh AK, Bhakat C, Singh P. A review on water intake in dairy cattle: associated factors, management practices, and corresponding effects. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2022;54(2):154.. doi:10.1007/s11250-022-03154-2.
35.  Sangtarash R, Faezi M. Hoof trimming as a part of lameness control in dairy farms. Eltiam. 2021;8(2):1-13.. dor: 20.1001.1.24235695.1400.8.2.2.8
36.         Mohamadnia A. Cattle functional and corrective hoof trimming (Fundamentals and methods). Eltiam. 2021;8(2):98-111.. dor: 20.1001.1.24235695.1400.8.2.3.9

  • Receive Date 18 April 2026
  • Accept Date 22 April 2026
  • Publish Date 21 January 2026